Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab

[Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx]

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:23:50 PST, "David S. Miller" said:

> If we are really going to do something like this, it should
> be calculated properly and be determined per-interface
> type as netdevs are registered.

Would you prefer to see this done for all interface types if we do it
at all, or would a special-case for 1 or 2 types that can use a slab
without being wasteful be an acceptable solution? (Let's face it - if
3.95 objects fit in each slab, we may not want to do it...)

pgpD0fPvJOgI0.pgp
Description: PGP signature