netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:16:28 -0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041218010024.GD21288@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Conectiva S.A.
References: <20041215012754.GH12937@xxxxxxxxx> <41BF9A95.5050902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041218010024.GD21288@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103)
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:59:49PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

Adrian Bunk wrote:

The patch below contans the following possible cleanups:
- make some needlessly global code static
- sch_htb.c: #undef HTB_DEBUG


diffstat output:
include/net/act_api.h   |    3 ---

Adrian, may I suggest that you post the networking related patches
only to netdev?


Until now I thought it's never a bad idea to Cc linux-kernel on any patches. Is there a specific reason why you consider this being a bad thing (well, bandwith shouldn't be that much of an issue considering how high-volume linux-kernel is...)?

I mentioned that when making the same request to another person one or
two days ago: all the networking hackers I know are subscribed to netdev,
several of them aren't subscribed to linux-kernel.

- Arnaldo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>