netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9

from [Patrick McHardy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:21:54 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041208113014.3dcad5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E188.5050800@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207170748.GF1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E722.2080600@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207213053.6bb602c1.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1102507470.1051.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B73263.4040706@xxxxxxxxx> <20041208113014.3dcad5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041008 Debian/1.7.3-5 
Stephen Hemminger wrote:


I don't know if this is related but something broke netem after 2.6.10-rc2
Now a simple request to delay 10ms ends up taking 1000ms.

Still narrowing down the changeset, but it isn't a change in netem
or tc utils since these didn't change.


I can't find anything in the Changelog that looks related.
Can you give me a testcase ?

Regards
Patrick
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] [IPV6]: Fix check if we're router., David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, Karsten Desler
Previous by Thread:  Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]