netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Dec 2004 14:49:48 -0500
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tgraf@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, tomc@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041208113014.3dcad5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E188.5050800@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207170748.GF1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E722.2080600@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207213053.6bb602c1.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1102507470.1051.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B73263.4040706@xxxxxxxxx> <20041208113014.3dcad5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Stephen,
Can we incoporate the tests from Thomas as part of iproute2?
I have about 20 or so i could add in. Maybe you could add some
for netem as well.

cheers,
jamal

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 14:30, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I don't know if this is related but something broke netem after 2.6.10-rc2
> Now a simple request to delay 10ms ends up taking 1000ms.
> 
> Still narrowing down the changeset, but it isn't a change in netem
> or tc utils since these didn't change.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>