netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Dec 2004 14:44:30 -0500
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tgraf@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, tomc@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <41B73263.4040706@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E188.5050800@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207170748.GF1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B5E722.2080600@xxxxxxxxx> <20041207213053.6bb602c1.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1102507470.1051.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41B73263.4040706@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:57, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> 
> >I can almost guarantee that one or more of those tests i outlined would
> >fail. So i would suggest a revert until the testing has been done.
> >
> Please be more specific than an "almost guarantee" that
> "one or more tests" may fail when asking to revert a patch
> that fixes an easily triggerable crash. For example, point
> to the code that makes you think it might fail.

I hope this is clear after you read the last email exchange i had with
Thomas and that you are not intentionaly trying to be annoying.

cheers,
jamal



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>