| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] rtnetlink & address family problem |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Dec 2004 08:20:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | Michal Ludvig <mludvig@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20041207131706.GB1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <41B0A5B4.6060108@xxxxxxx> <20041206140214.GA749@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1102386461.1093.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041207124922.GA1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1102424568.1089.120.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041207131706.GB1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 08:17, Thomas Graf wrote: > It's not really related to the gnet_stats code. stats_lock isn't set > in the action code when using an older iproute2. I haven't tested this > case because it was marked as broken anyway. Can you ping my memory on this? Is this tc with initial support for actions or something much older than that. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] rtnetlink & address family problem, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, P |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] rtnetlink & address family problem, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] rtnetlink & address family problem, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |