On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > I've tested all packet sizes now, and delayed TDT updating once per jiffy > (instead of once per packet) indeed gives about 25kpps more on 60,61,62 > byte packets, and is hardly worth it for bigger packets. Maybe we can't see any real gains here now, I wonder if it has any effect if you have lots of nics on the same bus. I mean, in theory it saves a whole lot of traffic on the bus. /Martin |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |