| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter |
| From: | Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:20:13 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041204120328.GA1191@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:03:28PM +0100 |
| References: | <200412032325.iB3NPdG04693@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041204005946.GA26654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041204021444.A5058@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041204120328.GA1191@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:03:28PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > 1 - Imho people at RedHat/wherever need more details (chipset, mobo, > dmesg, lspci -vx, 2.4.21 savor ?). Mainboard: Supermicro P4SCT+ Output of lspci -vx: attached Red Hat kernel: 2.4.21-20.EL > 2 - Testing recent 2.6.x will provide a different datapoint and a wider > review: a few people use e1000 for interested things here but they > do not necessarily have the resources to help with a specific vendor > released kernel. The vendor can use the datapoint though. Yes, ok, I might install RHEL4 beta or Fedora Core 3 on it next week and see how that works. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | global memory access, Lan Xue |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Scott Feldman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |