netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:51:39 -0800
Cc: michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041202135252.04e64f51.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20041027092531.78fe438c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200411020854.44745.michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041104100104.570e67cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200411051103.59032.michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041117153025.160eaa04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041130214643.7b72300e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041201152446.3a0d5ce3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041201204622.7b760400.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041202134930.132d7bd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041202135252.04e64f51.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:52:52 -0800
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:30 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > These are run on a relatively slow machine (2 way Pentium III 850Mhz)
> > and it looks like the results are no change (in the noise).
> 
> Or averaged out, about 1ms more expensive.

I am writing my own test since, that one seems so noisy.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>