| To: | mellia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:00:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jorge Manuel Finochietto <jorge.finochietto@xxxxxxxxx>, Giulio Galante <galante@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41A73826.3000109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1101467291.24742.70.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41A73826.3000109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:05:26PM +0000, P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >What is weird, is that if we artificially "preload" the NIC tx-fifo with > >packets, and then instruct it to start sending them, those are actually > >transmitted AT WIRE SPEED!! I've very interested in exactly what it is you're doing here. What do you mean by 'preload'? --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SiS900 Bugreport, Daniele Venzano |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: crappy/good gigabit chipsets?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Marco Mellia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |