| To: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:01:34 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20041118084449.Z14339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Chris Wright wrote: > Why not make a unix_seq_sendmsg, which is a very small wrapper? Good idea, patch forthcoming. > Does the above stop the other issue? My laptop died, so I'm not able to > test ATM. No, it seems to be caused when addrlen in sendto() is non-zero, causing unix_find_other() to be called instead of unix_peer_get(), which is screwing up reference counts. As for MSG_EOR, apart from the generic socket code, nothing is being done. This would be a separate issue. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Chris Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Chris Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Chris Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Chris Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |