| To: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] Use SLAB_PANIC when creating critical slab cache |
| From: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:51:57 -0800 |
| Cc: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4197BFC5.5080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:27:49PM -0200 |
| References: | <20041114121837.X2357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041114122400.D2357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4197BFC5.5080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Chris, > > I think somebody proposed this in the past and it was refused > because we better get rid of the panics and return an error, propagate > it and refuse to load the module, better have the machine still alive > but without networking than panic it. Sounds good too. Part of my thinking was that these patches would be a good chance to review if these are necessarily panic conditions. What was the plan on error return, since I expect some caches are interdependent? thanks, -chris |
| Previous by Date: | Re: A case AGAINST checksum offload, Pekka Pietikainen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use SLAB_PANIC when creating critical slab cache, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] Use SLAB_PANIC when creating critical slab cache, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] Use SLAB_PANIC when creating critical slab cache, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |