netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 -1 EAGAIN after allocation failure was: Re: Kernel 2.

To: Stefan Schmidt <zaphodb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 -1 EAGAIN after allocation failure was: Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:58:31 -0200
Cc: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041110120624.GF28163@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20041109164113.GD7632@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041109223558.GR1309@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109144607.2950a41a.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20041109235201.GC20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041110012733.GD20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109173920.08746dbd.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20041110020327.GE20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <419197EA.9090809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041110102854.GI20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041110120624.GF28163@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:28:54AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > > Can you try the following patch, please? It is diffed against 2.6.10-rc1,
> > > but I think it should apply to -mm kernels as well.
> I did. No apparent change with mm4 and vm.min_free_kbytes = 8192. I will try
> latest bk next.
> 
> > I unset CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP and i suppose this could have this kind of effect
> > on high connection rates.
> > I set it back to CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y and if the application does not freeze
> > for some hours at this load we can blame at least this issue (-1 EAGAIN) on
> > that parameter.
> Nope, that didn't change anything, still getting EAGAIN, checked two times.

Hi Stefan,

Its not clear to me - do you have Nick's watermark patch in? 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>