[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 -1 EAGAIN after allocation failure was: Re: Kernel 2.

To: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 -1 EAGAIN after allocation failure was: Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures
From: Stefan Schmidt <zaphodb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:28:54 +0100
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <419197EA.9090809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20041104121722.GB8537@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041104181856.GE28163@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109164113.GD7632@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041109223558.GR1309@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109144607.2950a41a.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20041109235201.GC20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041110012733.GD20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109173920.08746dbd.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20041110020327.GE20754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <419197EA.9090809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 03:24:10PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Can you try the following patch, please? It is diffed against 2.6.10-rc1,
> but I think it should apply to -mm kernels as well.
> Basically 2.6.8 and earlier kernels had some quirks in the page allocator
> that would allow for example, a large portion of "DMA" memory to be reserved
> for network memory allocations (atomic allocations). After 'fixing' this
> problem, 2.6.9 is effectively left with about a quarter the amount of memory
> reserved for network allocations compared with 2.6.8.
> The following patch roughly restores parity there. Thanks.
I applied the patch to 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 and the application froze again, but i
just remembered that i changed a kernel-option in mm4 and forgot about that
I unset CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP and i suppose this could have this kind of effect
on high connection rates.
I set it back to CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y and if the application does not freeze
for some hours at this load we can blame at least this issue (-1 EAGAIN) on
that parameter.

My variation of Harrisberger's Fourth Law of the Lab:
 Experience is directly proportional to the amount of braincells ruined.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>