| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier |
| From: | "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:46:21 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041109133035.GH31969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411091406570.20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041109133035.GH31969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411091406570.20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-11-09 14:27This is the try number two. What was changed: - Added selectable choice in Kconfig file (thanks Jamal!) - Don't abuse tc_u32_sel to not break backward compatibility (thanks Patrick!).Your patchs looks fine except for missing dependcy on CONFIG_NETFILTER. Either make CLS_U32_MARK dependant on it or #ifdef the references to skb->nfmark. Patch updated and attached. It might be fair to tell you that this code is likely to be removed again once we have the metadata match. Jamal already warned me about this. Is somebody already working on it? Cheers Thank you! --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel.umbrella.ro/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [(broken) PATCH] Sungem and wake_on_lan, Colin Leroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | [(broken) PATCH] Sungem and wake_on_lan, Colin Leroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |