| To: | "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:30:35 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411091406570.20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411091406570.20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411091406570.20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-11-09 14:27 > This is the try number two. > What was changed: > - Added selectable choice in Kconfig file (thanks Jamal!) > - Don't abuse tc_u32_sel to not break backward compatibility (thanks > Patrick!). Your patchs looks fine except for missing dependcy on CONFIG_NETFILTER. Either make CLS_U32_MARK dependant on it or #ifdef the references to skb->nfmark. It might be fair to tell you that this code is likely to be removed again once we have the metadata match. Cheers |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [TRY2] Use nfmark as a key in u32 classifier, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |