[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Asynchronous crypto layer.

To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous crypto layer.
From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:39:06 -0700
Cc: Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cryptoapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041029192741.5344ad0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cryptoapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1099030958.4944.148.camel@uganda> <1099053738.1024.104.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041029180652.113f0f6e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41824D9A.3070407@xxxxxxxx> <20041029183606.0b1a0538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410291636020.25667@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041029192741.5344ad0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 07:27:41PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> but it was designed to be usefull only in custom MX box, 

This is not true. I coded it using Hifn PCI card plugged in 440GP eval 
board as well in P4 2.6 GHz box.

Driver isn't perfect, it's quite simple, I suspended all work on it 
because without async crypto it doesn't make a lot of sense.

> so it has some design notes that I do not agree with.

And they are (I know there are problems, just curious which ones you 
"don't agree with") ? 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>