| To: | Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx (Matt Domsch) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:48:16 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041029215134.GA15414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Core |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686)) |
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > If dev->dev_addr is zero, then the memcpy() never takes place, and the Huh? You mean dev->addr_len? Surely the caller has to know what the address length is to use this anyway, no? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len, Matt Domsch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len, Matt Domsch |
| Next by Thread: | [2.6 patch] prism54: small prismcompat cleanup, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |