| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:16:35 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <cryptoapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1099062483.1023.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 29 Oct 2004, jamal wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 10:06, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > If we have a hardware accelerator chip, than we _already_ have improvements > > with even the worst async crypto layer, since software and hardware > > will work in parrallel. > > Thats what i am hoping - and theory points to it. Numbers, numbers > please ;-> There's an OpenBSD paper which demonstrates the usefulness of crypto hardware for reducing cpu contention. I can't get to their web site now, but it's there somewhere under a security link. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] IPSEC failover and replay detection sequence numbers, KOVACS Krisztian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] sk98lin: Driver update v7.09, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Asynchronous crypto layer., Michal Ludvig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Asynchronous crypto layer., Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |