[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Asynchronous crypto layer.

To: Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous crypto layer.
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Oct 2004 11:11:14 -0400
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cryptoapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410291636020.25667@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1099030958.4944.148.camel@uganda> <1099053738.1024.104.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041029180652.113f0f6e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41824D9A.3070407@xxxxxxxx> <20041029183606.0b1a0538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410291636020.25667@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 10:53, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > 
> > If you compile this sources then you will still have old sync behaviour, 
> > IPsec and any other old-style application should be rewritten(like 
> > attached consumer.c) to use new asynchronous crypto layer features.
> This could be a bit of problem, because AFAIK the IPsec code doesn't allow 
> sleeping while processing the packet. It will likely need a bigger 
> rewrite.

I dont think its a big rewrite.  


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>