| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:36:15 -0400 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, nakasima@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041025.152749.00307602.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200410232313.AA00003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <417C9A4E.3030909@xxxxxxxxx> <20041025.152749.00307602.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 |
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: In article <417C9A4E.3030909@xxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:16:46 -0400), Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> says:Note that eepro100 driver will be deleted soon.I'm afraid that e100 does not work well on some systems (e.g. my ThinkPad T30 on 2.4.x) while eepro100 does. (I also know there're systems which does not work well with eepro100 but e100.) Has all of such kind of issues been solved? My overall position is, -almost all- the issues have been solved in e100, so this should flush the last remaining ones out of the woodwork. Otherwise nobody will ever notice much less test e100 on these various edge cases.
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] select appropriate skb size in tcp_sendmsg when TSO is used, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning, Terje Kvernes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |