| To: | Brian.Haley@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup) |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:39 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <417E92D9.1050305@xxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <417E5F37.4010501@xxxxxx> <20041027.004359.62730834.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <417E92D9.1050305@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <417E92D9.1050305@xxxxxx> (at Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:09:29 -0400), Brian Haley <Brian.Haley@xxxxxx> says: > > Second, because we're not ready to migrate. > > Please do not do that (pushing it to the glibc people) until we're ready. > > We really need to do in consistent way; kernel header / glibc header, > > and even with other systems. > > The kernel struct is the correct size (since addr[0] has no size), > ip6_rthdr0 in ip6.h is not, it's 128 bits too big. Let me know the > right steps to go through to correct this and I'll get it done, you can > send it off-line if you like. Because we do not support RFC3542, extra 128bits is definitely correct. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] select appropriate skb size in tcp_sendmsg when TSO is used, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] select appropriate skb size in tcp_sendmsg when TSO is used, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup), Brian Haley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup), Brian Haley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |