| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c |
| From: | Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20041022232403.GA14618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1CK3Az-0004P2-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020164748.GA20905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020212651.GA8534@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020225536.GA22179@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021130339.GA19345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021165224.GA25399@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021215743.GA23062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022185435.GA30709@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022215040.GA13309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022232403.GA14618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 09:24:03AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Actually, I think we've caught your crash now. If that code path > is triggering at all, then it'll trigger with TSO packets too. If > we get a truly partial ack on a TSO packet, then tcp_tso_acked will > not trim it off. So we will fall through to this last-ditch trim > call, which doesn't update packets_out. > > There are two solutions to this problem. I've taken the simpler > approach for now. We simply trim off the partial bits in tcp_tso_acked > and live with the fact that the packet counters may differ from > what's on the netwrok by one. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Later on we can "fix" this by remembering where the original TSO > packet started from, perhaps in skb->h or somewhere. Dave, is this > worth it? Looks like your most recent 2 patches did the trick. Uptime on the test box is over 4 hours, whereas before I could count on a panic within about an hour. I'll continue running 2.6.9 + your patches and let you know if this changes... Thanks, Phil |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning, Terje Kvernes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1] remove NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL, Arjan van de Ven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |