netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:16:07 +1000
Cc: laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lmb@xxxxxxx, ahu@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041022160559.28f9c540.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20041021142527.GG3551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CKkWZ-0005x5-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022160559.28f9c540.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:05:59PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:31:07 +1000
> Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Initially I considered an interface where kernel users can register
> > themselves using a string as the key.  But I soon realised that we
> > could simply allow the netlink_family field to be an arbitrary integer
> > that is used as a key to a hash table.
> 
> (I assume you mean "nl_family" not "netlink_family" :-)

I'm no plans yet in taking over all address families :)
I'm only referring to the third argument in socket(2).

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>