| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target) |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:16:07 +1000 |
| Cc: | laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lmb@xxxxxxx, ahu@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041022160559.28f9c540.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041021142527.GG3551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CKkWZ-0005x5-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022160559.28f9c540.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:05:59PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:31:07 +1000 > Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Initially I considered an interface where kernel users can register > > themselves using a string as the key. But I soon realised that we > > could simply allow the netlink_family field to be an arbitrary integer > > that is used as a key to a hash table. > > (I assume you mean "nl_family" not "netlink_family" :-) I'm no plans yet in taking over all address families :) I'm only referring to the third argument in socket(2). Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |