| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target) |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:25:33 +1000 |
| Cc: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lmb@xxxxxxx, ahu@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041021225315.GH19714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041021142527.GG3551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CKkWZ-0005x5-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021225315.GH19714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:53:15AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > The only real problem I see is sk_protocol being only 8bit as > limiting factor. Well we wouldn't be using sk_protocol to look things up anymore. We'd be holding a reference on the family directly once the socket is created. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target), jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |