| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket? |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:18:03 -0300 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041020164241.5f29cea5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <20041020130134.GC24757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020151448.51209278.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020223547.GJ29583@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020155352.1c9b70f6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020230405.GE995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020160728.1d5a337e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020232719.GG995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020164241.5f29cea5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) |
David S. Miller wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:27:19 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:ok. good. I remember the times when you made jokes about the sizeof TCBs in some other OSes. I bet we beat them all now in bloat, but it's good that things are shrinking again.Nope, Solaris's TCB is still 3 times the size of ours. BSD's is about the same size, yet they lack most of the congestion control and ECN functionality we have. <joke> That doesn't mean we should keep trying to get to their level ;) </joke> /me goes back to his pile of sk_buff layer header pointers patches :-) - Arnaldo |
| Previous by Date: | r8169 - dac testing (was: [mini-RFT] r8169 and amd64), Srihari Vijayaraghavan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.9-041019, Jeff Chua |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |