| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:08:49 -0700 |
| Cc: | mailing-lists@xxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041020230929.GA9390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <417675C6.3040704@xxxxxx> <E1CKOXc-0002Kq-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020230929.GA9390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:09:29 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:02:44AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > Looks like nobody has tested shunt routes for a while. > > > > It's a kernel bug. We're not setting the family field in the selector. > > This patch fixes it. > > Dave, please scratch that patch. The family is already being set > elsewhere. Until we have real cross-family transforms this won't > be needed. So why is the unknown address error occuring for this case? Is it just a case we don't need to worry about at this time? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |