| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:07:28 -0700 |
| Cc: | buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041020230405.GE995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041020130134.GC24757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020151448.51209278.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020223547.GJ29583@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020155352.1c9b70f6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020230405.GE995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:04:05 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it really necessary? Our struct sock is already bloated enough > as is ... If Lennert needs it for some obscure purpose it's probably > better if he just does it locally. There are a couple of "__u32" holes before pointers in tcp_opt which is the space I was going to use for this new item. tcp_opt will be getting smaller some time soon as well, since we can consolidate most of the congestion control knobs into a single set of datums or some kind of union. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] DPD Problem - message from kernel malformed: unknown address family, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: way of figuring out total number of retransmitted packets on a TCP socket?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |