| To: | Danny <dannydaemonic@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | profile path bug again (was Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT) |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:01:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9625752b04101514073f6dab24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <9625752b041013091772e26739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9625752b04101309182a96fbd2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200410131129.05657.jdmason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041013181840.GA30852@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9625752b04101313417be4cf90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041013205433.GC30761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9625752b04101314595f72f84a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9625752b04101415043a078b93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041015161818.GA2577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9625752b04101514073f6dab24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Danny <dannydaemonic@xxxxxxxxx> : [profile path bug hits hard] > Also posting the oops directly instead of linking to it probably > allows people passing by to look at the oops, increasing the total > number of eyes. Yes. Oops posting is still on-topic in l-k. > I have a quick question though, if I'm using the kernel with all the > debug features turned on, should I still run it through ksymoops? Your file named "oops-raw" contained the relevant information. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Re: xfrm_user.c doesn't use NLMSG_F_MULTI, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC] Yield in netlink_broadcast when congested, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT, Danny |
| Next by Thread: | Re: profile path bug again (was Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT), Danny |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |