| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI) |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Oct 2004 01:44:13 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <16741.45331.743721.822091@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41633174.7070805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16740.17875.574967.11417@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <41646587.7070401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41649425.1010102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16741.45331.743721.822091@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:11:47PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > I'm interested if anyone has done any pktgen performance tests with > w. S2IO or other 10G card we need to upgrade the lab equipment. > Both 64 byte pkts and MTU sized pkts is interesting. Anyone? If you're interested in raw pps numbers and willing to use something other than pktgen to attain them, you might want to look into the intel IXP-based boards. You actually have to write some microcode and upload it to an on-chip processor array, but you can easily sustain wirespeed at 4Gbps (IXP2400-based) or 10Gbps (IXP2800-based.) --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down, Matt Mackall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI), Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI), P |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |