| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TCP] Show all SYN_RECV sockets in /proc/net/tcp |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:58:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1CF1eo-0003qW-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <416355BD.50402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CF1eo-0003qW-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:35:58 +1000 Herbert Xu wrote: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | > | > Go ahead and do it with the current seq_file infrastructure 8) Standard | | Does the current seq_file infrastructure offer anything new compared | to what's in the existing /proc/net/tcp code? | | > answer for these cases is remove /proc/net/tcp altogether and convert | > the userland tools to use netlink instead. | | Completely agreed. As I said I only started looking at this because | I was trying to fix tcp_diag. Dave's other standard answer is "don't mess up the userland API", including /proc interfaces. (not to put words into Dave's mouth) -- ~Randy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TCP] Fixed bug that hid sockets in tcp_diag, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TCP] Show all SYN_RECV sockets in /proc/net/tcp, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TCP] Show all SYN_RECV sockets in /proc/net/tcp, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TCP] Show all SYN_RECV sockets in /proc/net/tcp, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |