| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:51:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041001124733.1ac4266a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040930213221.06a3f5b3.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041001121123.19511403.ak@xxxxxxx> <20041001124733.1ac4266a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:47:33PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:11:23 +0200 > Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Do you want me to play with the new sysctl too? > > Yes. Already did, see my other mail (I should not read incoming mail in the wrong order @) > > > max win adv: 5840 bytes max win adv: 63712 > > bytes > > min win adv: 5840 bytes min win adv: 5792 > > bytes > > That stinks that the receiver is only using a 64K window, > that's way too small for gigabit. Just using the default, no tuning. I have some patches in the pipeline to do automatic window tuning based on link speed based on dev->features. But they were actually more intended for 10Gbit/s (where all the defaults are completely inadequate) And it needs a bit more work. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |