| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:09:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040929142750.27b35952.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040928214722.11aef8e0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16730.53965.503605.943263@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040929125359.12a00ba7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1096492842.2344.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040929142750.27b35952.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:27:50PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:20:43 -0400 > Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It can also > > > be the case that the longest matching prefix entry has no matching > > > TOS key, whereas a shorter prefix does. > > > > No routing protocols are distributing TOS-specific routes, and there is > > no prospect of that feature ever coming back. Why pay the cost of > > matching TOS on every packet forwarded? > > Because once we add functionality to the kernel we can't simply > rip it out. People do use TOS routing, via static routes or > similar. I'm not so sure anybody uses it really. How about adding a printk for it and seeing if anybody complains? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |