netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:44:19 -0700
Cc: niv@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <415B2B2B.5050904@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1096481023.8636.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <415AFB63.7010107@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040929132247.227fffcd.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <415B220F.4040102@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040929142401.664d8fd7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <415B2B2B.5050904@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:37:47 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David S. Miller wrote:
> > When I don't have any networking work present, that tree is
> > simply deleted.  So if you pull and get a URL error, that just
> > means no changes pending and Linus has everything. :-)
> 
> No need to delete it.  When Linus merges your stuff, net-2.6 tree 
> becomes equivalent to linux-2.6 tree.
> 
> When you next create and push local changes, a few days later, it is 
> guaranteed that there will be no conflicts between your local and 
> bkbits.net trees.

Ok, works for me.  I'll try to do this from now on.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>