[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c

To: Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:43:49 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1096492842.2344.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040928214722.11aef8e0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16730.53965.503605.943263@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040929125359.12a00ba7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1096492842.2344.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steven Blake writes:

 > No routing protocols are distributing TOS-specific routes, and there is
 > no prospect of that feature ever coming back.  Why pay the cost of
 > matching TOS on every packet forwarded?

 Well you may be right but with a pluggable lookup algo we could choose
 between TOS-capable/complex and more lightweight and speedy things.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>