[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:37:47 -0400
Cc: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040929142401.664d8fd7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1096481023.8636.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <415AFB63.7010107@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040929132247.227fffcd.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <415B220F.4040102@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040929142401.664d8fd7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
David S. Miller wrote:
When I don't have any networking work present, that tree is
simply deleted.  So if you pull and get a URL error, that just
means no changes pending and Linus has everything. :-)

No need to delete it. When Linus merges your stuff, net-2.6 tree becomes equivalent to linux-2.6 tree.

When you next create and push local changes, a few days later, it is guaranteed that there will be no conflicts between your local and trees.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>