[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c

To: Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:27:50 -0700
Cc: Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1096492842.2344.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040928214722.11aef8e0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16730.53965.503605.943263@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040929125359.12a00ba7.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1096492842.2344.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:20:43 -0400
Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > It can also
> > be the case that the longest matching prefix entry has no matching
> > TOS key, whereas a shorter prefix does.
> No routing protocols are distributing TOS-specific routes, and there is
> no prospect of that feature ever coming back.  Why pay the cost of
> matching TOS on every packet forwarded?

Because once we add functionality to the kernel we can't simply
rip it out.  People do use TOS routing, via static routes or

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>