| To: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx (Nivedita Singhvi) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:23:23 +1000 |
| Cc: | jheffner@xxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, andy.grover@xxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4159117A.4010904@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Core |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686)) |
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But I guess my question is - don't we need some > heuristics to figure out when we should send partial > (i.e. abandoning waiting for full TSO)? Currently we're relying on Nagle to do that. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: recommendations for NIC HW(/SW) design?, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [6/6]: jenkins hash for neigh / Statistics, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, John Heffner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |