[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [6/6]: jenkins hash for neigh / Statistics

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [6/6]: jenkins hash for neigh / Statistics
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:27:38 -0700
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040927160636.7741d973.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20040925005623.2faf8faf.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CBu70-00010X-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040927121403.767e2308.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040927222613.GE3236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040927160636.7741d973.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 16:06 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:26:13 +0200
> Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As stated before, I would like to change rt_stat and ct_stat in order to
> > include a first 'template' line, too.  This way it is easier to write a
> > generic foo_stat program, that could deal with any of those statistics
> > files, even with new ones...  but this of course would break existing
> > rtstat binaries.  I personally  don't care, since it's a little-known
> > and little-used feature, which to my knowledge is in a lot of
> > distributions either non-existant [Debian] or incompatible [SuSE]. What
> > do you think?
> I agree.  And while we're add it let's get a fixed rtstat into
> iproute2 and make sure that binary gets installed by default
> so maybe the dists will start shipping it properly.

I have the old one in the repository.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>