| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Sep 2004 08:59:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040924220651.GA6096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <4150E7E5.2000001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922045239.GA19573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095854920.1047.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922105221.59a67d4b.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4152EE68.4030803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040923121651.51a58cf2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924032830.GC6384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040923223909.6f4da27f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924062604.GA7393@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924105855.0e1aecd0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924220651.GA6096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 18:06, Herbert Xu wrote: > I agree completely. I'm just saying that the current NLM_GOODSIZE > skb is the perfect scratch-pad so we don't need a new one. All we > need to do is to insert a helper call just before netlink_unicast > to copy and trim the packet in the places that need it. You are probably talking past each other - to me you seem to be saying the same thing. A "manager" of some form is required. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] 3c59x - use netdev_priv, Steffen Klassert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |