| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Sep 2004 08:53:11 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040924032830.GC6384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20040920025802.GA11567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095683660.1047.254.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414F1E12.6010808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922000503.GA13218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4150E7E5.2000001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922045239.GA19573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095854920.1047.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922105221.59a67d4b.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4152EE68.4030803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040923121651.51a58cf2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924032830.GC6384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 23:28, Herbert Xu wrote: > Most of the dump messages should be close to PAGE_SIZE anyway, no? 20 bytes for the header; typical messages and attributes are in the range of 20 bytes. In the problematic case #2 or #3 (from what i have seen) in your previous email, you get events being broadcast to multiple users occupying say 400 bytes or about 10 messages (~10%) when 4096 is charged to the socket receive queue. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |