netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Sep 2004 08:41:09 -0400
Cc: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040924032002.GA6384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <20040920025802.GA11567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095683660.1047.254.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414F1E12.6010808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922000503.GA13218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4150E7E5.2000001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1095821624.1045.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922034634.GA14928@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095852956.1048.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040923120520.GA32624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095994597.1045.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040924032002.GA6384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 23:20, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:56:37PM -0400, jamal wrote:
> >
> > > What's wrong with the default sizes? If you decrease it far enough
> > > of course it's going to overflow.
> > 
> > The idea is to reproduce the overun ;->
> 
> OK, I've just tried 4096 and nothing:

Try harder! ;-> 
Ok, I will go and lookup my test machine and get back with an exact test
case (problem is whenever i have time to scan my emails i am at least 30
minutes away from that box).

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>