Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth

netdev

Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth

To:	Krishna Kumar <kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:26:36 -0700
Cc:	laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<OF75C0DF94.8BDAC480-ON88256F19.006C04FD-88256F19.006EF59D@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20040923225127.10b0ef68.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <OF75C0DF94.8BDAC480-ON88256F19.006C04FD-88256F19.006EF59D@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:11:58 -0700
Krishna Kumar <kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In neigh_hash_grow(), next need not be set to NULL.

I thought the compiler would warn, but aparently it
doesn't, so I'll remove the assignment, thanks.

Perhaps an older version of gcc, which has poorer flow
analysis, will warn though... we'll see.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, David S. Miller Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, Krishna Kumar Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, David S. Miller <= Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, Herbert Xu Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, Krishna Kumar
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH/RFC] PATCH: IPV6: Fix multiple leakages (is Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun6to4 to become free.), Andre Tomt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, Krishna Kumar
Next by Thread:	Re: [5/6]: Dynamic neigh hash table growth, Herbert Xu
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]