On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:14:33PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's gone until someone fixes it up into working condition
> > once more. It's been broken ever since the first bits
> > of IPSEC dst cache infrastructure went in.
>
> Also netfilter has a static NAT too these days, so it doesn't
> seem to be very useful to have another one.
yes and no.
From a functionality point of view: yes.
From a performance point of view, there are applications for really dumb
static NAT where you don't want to pull all the dependencies from
ip_conntrack over ip_tables.
> -Andi
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|