| To: | Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: msleep changes |
| From: | margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx (Margit Schubert-While) |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:24:33 +0200 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Nish,
In latest BK :
# drivers/atm/lanai.c
# 2004/09/21 14:58:17-07:00 chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 -1
# [ATM]: [drivers] Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()
# From Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
--- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 17:11:30 -07:00
+++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 17:11:30 -07:00
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
break;
}
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
+ msleep(4);
??????
Just one that immediately lept to my eye.
I am not going to check them all.
That's your job :-)
These msleep(_interruptible) changes have been tested or ?
Margit
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Routing] Performance Comparison between 2.6 and 2.4 kernel, Song Wang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.6]: fix unbalances spin_unlock_bh in __xfrm_find_acq_byseq, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] e1000 - avoid filling tx ring completely., Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: msleep changes, Nishanth Aravamudan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |