| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:28:16 -0700 |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040922195515.GA2619@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040920063012.GL2825@krispykreme> <20040920203021.GD4242@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921155835.18aee381.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922140000.GD27432@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922111209.7887df53.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922195515.GA2619@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:55:15 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I must add that this is a CSA e1000 (directly integrated into > the chipset and doesn't use PCI) and TSO doesn't seem to be > bring any advantage. On 2.6.5 the performance is the same > with both TSO on or off. That's expected. It decreases the cpu and bus load, but if those are capable of running the card full tilt already TSO buys you nothing except spare cpu and memory cycles for other work on your system. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bug 3440] New: eth0 freezes: "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out ", Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, John Heffner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6] natsemi.c NAPI, Harald Welte |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |