| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:07:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040922195515.GA2619@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040920063012.GL2825@krispykreme> <20040920203021.GD4242@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921155835.18aee381.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922140000.GD27432@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922111209.7887df53.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922195515.GA2619@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031030 |
Andi Kleen wrote: With tso off i get the same performance as on 2.6.5. I must add that this is a CSA e1000 (directly integrated intothe chipset and doesn't use PCI) and TSO doesn't seem to be bring any advantage. On 2.6.5 the performance is the samewith both TSO on or off. Andi, was that with a netperf TCP stream test? I would not have thought there would be no difference prior to the changes DaveM made recently (now we obey congestion window). We certainly got quite a bit of a difference running SPECWeb etc, but that was on the e1000s. Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [Bug 3419] New: kernel BUG at net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1039!, Jesse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Andrew Grover |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |