netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem

To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:57:52 -0700
Cc: pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040920.152012.114156249.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040919074605.GJ6005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409200806460.22679-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040920.152012.114156249.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:20:12 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This behavior lives for years (AFAIK),
> and we haven't got so many reports 
> because people usually bring loopback device first.
> 
> I think the following message will help people, anyway.

If ipv6 has a dependency upon this, why doesn't it just
bring the device up itself at this moment if necessary?

It is kind of silly to force this device up ordering
upon people anyways.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>