| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures |
| From: | Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:38:58 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1095764621.1049.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095645106.1048.190.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095686672.1049.301.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921034212.GA28462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921090423.GE8058@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921093252.GA32545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095764621.1049.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 07:03, jamal wrote: > Important for marketing to be able to claim _full_ RFC 1812 compliance. > Kepp the TOS! > I know it sounds silly, but there are a lot more foolish people out > there addicted to glossyware. RFC 1812 was written before TOS routes were pulled out of OSPFv2 (due to too fee independent implementations). No one implements FIB lookup as described in RFC 1812 in the core. What people do implement is PBR, as well as DSCP-based nexthop selection for MPLS DIFF-TE (RFC 3564). Regards, // Steve |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PPP-over-L2TP kernel support, new patch for review, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6 NET] Fix ifmap alignment issues over rtnetlink, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |