| To: | Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:02:49 +1000 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1C8way-0000aH-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <414D0CCD.90209@xxxxxxxxxxx> <E1C8way-0000aH-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Besides, for any netlink socket but the first for a process, they'll > all have negative pid's which have nothing to do with the real pid. > So I really think that the wake_up_process hunk is bogus. Another reason why this is bogus. Most kernel users of unicast have a send timeout setting of 0. Therefore your wake_up_process() call will never happen when netlink_attachskb is called by the kernel. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |